Putnam’s health-care analysts and portfolio managers offer their outlooks and perspectives on key aspects of the COVID-19 pandemic.
- Until a safe and effective vaccine is available, the best near-term solutions are effective therapeutic drugs.
- Neutralizing antibodies have the potential to significantly reduce mortality rates, and we expect to see initial clinical trials data over the summer.
- The quantity of available tests is growing, and companies are ramping up capacity.
Analyst, health care and biotechnology
The vaccine is a long-term solution
A key resource for our in-house research has been the guidance of Scott Gottlieb, M.D., former U.S. Food and Drug Administration commissioner. We are in agreement with his view that a safe and effective vaccine will not be ready for mass manufacturing in 2020, and perhaps not for two years. As a result, the best near-term solutions are effective therapeutic drugs.
Antivirals: Treating current COVID-19 patients, the first wave
On a much faster track than the vaccine are drugs that are used to treat people once they’ve become sick. I expect the initial therapies to provide modest benefits in COVID-19 patients, such as accelerated recovery times and shortened hospitalizations. These include remdesivir, an experimental antiviral drug from Gilead Sciences, and Actemra (anti-IL6), a drug from Roche that is already in use for treating rheumatoid arthritis.
The first remdesivir study in severe COVID-19 patients in China did not show a benefit, and the first large randomized anti-IL6 study reported mixed results and may only be modestly effective in critically ill COVID-19 patients. While more recent remdesivir data indicate that it may improve time to recovery by approximately 30%, other data sets have been more mixed. It appears that remdesivir is unlikely to bend the curve enough to allow us to meaningfully reduce social distancing measures. There are several studies yet to report through May, and remdesivir has the greatest potential to help mild to moderate COVID-19 patients, with the caveat that there may be insufficient supply to treat such a large patient population.
Remdesivir is unlikely to bend the curve enough to allow us to meaningfully reduce social distancing measures.
“Convalescent” plasma: Help from recovered patients
Experimental antibody treatments are being used for some of the most severe cases of COVID-19. With this process, blood and serum are taken from patients who have recovered from COVID-19. It is then purified, and the antibodies — which prevent the virus from replicating — are extracted and infused into COVID-19 patients.
We believe neutralizing antibodies have the potential to significantly reduce mortality rates. In my view, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals is in the lead for developing an effective treatment by manufacturing select neutralizing antibodies from recovered COVID-19 patients. The company plans to begin clinical trials in June, and we expect to see initial data over the summer.
The supply/demand challenge
These therapies could reduce mortality and the severity of the disease, allowing patients to leave hospitals sooner. However, because they cannot be administered in an outpatient setting, or at sufficient scale, hospitals will continue to be burdened with COVID-19 caseloads. In the short term, there is still a mismatch of supply and demand, and equipment shortages continue to be a challenge.
William C. Rives, CFA
Portfolio Manager, Analyst
Putnam Research Fund
Testing: The big challenge is logistics
The science of creating tests for COVID-19 is not nearly as complex or difficult as developing a vaccine. The technology and capacity to develop tests is in place, but the bigger hurdle today is getting a system in place to conduct mass testing. We do not yet have a central organization directing these efforts, but several effective tests are approved and should become available for everyone who needs them.
The science of creating tests for COVID-19 is not nearly as complex or difficult as developing a vaccine.
Who has the virus and who has recovered?
There are two methods of testing for COVID-19. The PCR test is a molecular test designed to identify viral loads and determine if a person currently has the virus. This is the test we’ve heard about most in the news, and it has largely been limited to people who are coming into hospitals with symptoms. Many PCR tests are already approved for use, and there is significant manufacturing capacity.
The second type of test, the serological test, looks for antibodies in the blood to detect a person’s immune response and determine if they have already had the virus. Progress in this area is slightly behind that of PCR testing, as work continues to determine the accuracy of these tests.
Speed of PCR results and production are improving
The speed of results and scale of availability continue to increase. Today, there are point-of-care tests available that can produce results in under an hour and potentially in just 15 minutes. Hospital-based PCR tests are being developed with turnaround times of two to four hours. One company, LabCorp, received FDA authorization to send an at-home PCR test and will begin shipping to consumers in the coming weeks. At the same time, the quantity of available tests is growing. Companies that are ramping up capacity include Thermo Fisher Scientific (5 million tests per week); Hologic (1 million tests per week); Abbott Laboratories (1.25 million tests per week); Qiagen (1–2 million tests per week); and Roche (1 million tests per week).
The number of available tests is growing, some tests deliver results within hours, and an at-home test has received FDA authorization.
Within a few months, we believe testing should be much more widespread. Quicker tests will likely be used for health-care workers and at-risk populations, while the higher throughput tests will be used for the general population. In the past week in the United States, an average of 225,000 tests per day were conducted, and this will continue to increase. By June, we may see as many as 500,000 conducted each day.
Testing is key to easing restrictions
Testing results should help authorities determine how aggressively to ease quarantine restrictions and reopen businesses and communities while vaccine development continues. Those who have recovered from COVID-19 and developed immunity may be able to get back into the workforce sooner. As infections decline and stay-at-home orders are lifted, we are likely to see widespread testing to detect immediately when new clusters of infections emerge. In these areas, measures such as social distancing can be quickly reintroduced to slow the spread. As a result of improved testing, hospitals will be less overwhelmed and patient outcomes should improve considerably.
Testing will play a slightly different, but just as important, role over the longer term. I believe that testing and monitoring of the population will become a permanent part of our new normal. The goal will be to put comprehensive testing procedures in place to prepare for — and ideally prevent — future outbreaks of COVID-19 as well as other viruses.
Michael J. Maguire, CFA
Portfolio Manager, Analyst
Putnam Global Health Care Fund
The challenges ahead
Among the most frustrating aspects of this crisis is the fact that an “all clear” for COVID-19 depends on a comprehensive vaccination program that is effective and safe. Since this solution is at least one year away, if not two or more, we need to assume for the time being that it does not exist as we try to plan for reopening economies and businesses.
On the positive side, if we achieve sufficient hospital capacity, fulfill equipment needs, and create a better mechanism for catching patients earlier in the viral load, we will manage COVID-19 more effectively. If we encounter another wave of infections in the fall, I would be surprised if the mortality rates are anywhere near the levels we have seen with this first wave. In this scenario, a second wave might be considered a non-event by equity markets.
As investors, of course, we are researching the risks and opportunities resulting from this global pandemic. While the human toll is devastating, businesses are responding. Many recent top-performing stocks represent companies that are creating tests, as well as the suppliers to those companies. These businesses should continue to benefit as the number of diagnostic tests conducted globally will be sustainably higher than in the past. We are also likely to see increased spending on medical research, particularly in the area of infectious diseases. This will be beneficial for life sciences companies.
As investors, we are researching the opportunities resulting from this crisis, including companies that are creating tests and the suppliers to those companies.
Companies that will be negatively affected are those with leverage and those with elective procedure risk — the cancellations of any procedures that are not considered critical, such as orthopedic surgeries or dental appointments. Since we have entered a recessionary environment, this elective procedure risk could be with us for some time. Most vulnerable are the hospitals themselves, which operate with financial leverage and will be under significant pricing pressure due largely to much fewer elective procedures.
Putnam Global Health Care Fund
Top 10 holdings as of 3/31/20
UnitedHealth Group, 5.87%
Novartis Ag, 5.63%
Roche Holding Ag, 5.54%
Johnson & Johnson, 5.29%
Eli Lilly, 3.41%
Ascendis Pharma A/S, 3.19%
Top 10 holdings, percent of portfolio: 47.81%
Consider these risks before investing: International investing involves currency, economic, and political risks. Emerging-market securities carry illiquidity and volatility risks. Investments in small and/or midsize companies increase the risk of greater price fluctuations. The health care industries may be affected by technological obsolescence, changes in regulatory approval policies for drugs, medical devices, or procedures, and changes in governmental and private payment systems. The fund concentrates on a limited group of industries and is non-diversified. Because the fund may invest in fewer issuers than a diversified fund, it is vulnerable to common economic forces and may result in greater losses and volatility. Growth stocks may be more susceptible to earnings disappointments, and value stocks may fail to rebound. The use of short selling may result in losses if the securities appreciate in value. Risks associated with derivatives include increased investment exposure (which may be considered leverage) and, in the case of over-the-counter instruments, the potential inability to terminate or sell derivatives positions and the potential failure of the other party to the instrument to meet its obligations. The value of investments in the fund’s portfolio may fall or fail to rise over extended periods of time for a variety of reasons, including general economic, political, or financial market conditions; investor sentiment and market perceptions; government actions; geopolitical events or changes; and factors related to a specific issuer, geography, industry, or sector. These and other factors may lead to increased volatility and reduced liquidity in the fund’s portfolio holdings. You can lose money by investing in the fund.
Putnam Research Fund
Top 10 holdings as of 3/31/20
Microsoft Corp, 5.96%
Activision Blizzard, 2.42%
Procter Gamble, 2.20%
Fidelity National Information Services, 2.09%
Home Depot, 1.90%
Top 10 holdings, percent of portfolio: 28.95%
Consider these risks before investing: Growth stocks may be more susceptible to earnings disappointments, and value stocks may fail to rebound. The value of investments in the fund’s portfolio may fall or fail to rise over extended periods of time for a variety of reasons, including general economic, political, or financial market conditions; investor sentiment and market perceptions; government actions; geopolitical events or changes; and factors related to a specific issuer, geography, industry, or sector. These and other factors may lead to increased volatility and reduced liquidity in the fund’s portfolio holdings. You can lose money by investing in the fund.
More in: Equity, Macroeconomics