Where to watch for job losses, by sector

Where to watch for job losses, by sector

  • The U.S., Europe, and China offered glimmers of hope for risk assets in November, but our focus remains on the outlook for job losses.
  • Some market participants and FOMC members are debating whether profitable businesses might hoard labor, but we would note that businesses that close lose all their jobs.
  • By analyzing new business formation and hiring, we can point to sectors likely to face profitability pressure and greater job losses, as well as tentative signs this is starting.

New businesses may be the first to go

Young businesses are a major source of employment, a key variable determining the economic cycle. In the short-lived Covid-19 recession of February–April 2020, new business formation slowed for a short period, but then surged. By early 2022, the pace of net business formation had reached the highest pace of the last 30 years.

A sizeable number of young firms have not faced the forces of creative destruction yet. The current business failure rates for young establishments are at historical lows: 14.8% for newly formed businesses, 12% for businesses between 1 and 2 years old, and 9.6% for businesses between 2 and 3 years old. On average, 21% of new businesses fail within a year, and this figure rises to 24% during a typical recession.

U.S. hiring since 2021 has been led by firms younger than 3 years old

U.S. employment gains by age of establishment, annual, 1997–2022

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Note, data is not available for establishments 4 to 9 years old before 2003 and for establishments over 10 years old before 2013. For illustrative purposes only.

Business formation accelerated in all non-farm business sectors but was especially significant in some industries. Information technology almost doubled the pace of business formation from 2020 to 2022. Newly formed businesses in professional, scientific, and technical services (including management services); finance and insurance; transportation and warehousing; administrative services; and education also increased more than 50% in the last two years. Professional, scientific, and technical services and health care continue to constitute the largest share of newly formed firms. Some of the sectors with higher than usual new business shares had notable contribution to employment growth in the past two years.

Outlook for business failure and job losses by sector

Professional and business services, along with transportation and warehousing, did not have any job losses on an annual basis and continued to add to payrolls. In professional and business services, newly formed firms were the main sources of job growth. In transportation and warehousing, older firms contributed to job growth as well. As the impact of monetary tightening starts to affect businesses’ profitability and to increase business failure rates, employment gains are likely to slow and then contract in these sectors. Since the share of young businesses is larger in professional business services, job losses in this sector may be significant.

Administrative services also added significantly to employment after the Covid pandemic. Most job gains in this sector reflect the expansion of other businesses. The increase in temporary help services, a large administrative services subsector, has been the key contributor to employment gains. More and more businesses are relying on temporary help services because of the flexibility they provide. Large businesses report they are hiring more temporary workers given the uncertain outlook of this inflationary cycle. When the economy turns, this sector will be reporting a lot of job losses even though many of the established firms may not fail.

Retail trade added considerably to employment growth. This sector may not currently be dominated by newly formed businesses, but given its structural decline, the share of newly formed businesses, 15.57%, might be a bit high. As retail trade tends to have small profit margins and is currently employing more staff now than prior to Covid, it is highly exposed to bankruptcies and job losses.

Finance and insurance did not have job losses on an annual basis, and the share of newly formed businesses is now around historical averages. Now that housing activity has been slowing, finance and insurance is likely to report job losses.

Health care is one of the largest employers and has a high proportion of newly formed businesses. Still, job losses by older businesses were so large that total employment has not recovered to pre-Covid levels yet. Health care employment tends to be one of the least affected by a downturn. Unless we have another health care shock, employment in this sector should be sustained.

The information sector seems to have the most froth, as the proportion of immature businesses is very high. This sector typically has high business and employment turnover, but its overall contribution to total employment growth is small. When high funding costs start to bite, it might not matter much for total employment but could weigh more on financial markets, which are heavily exposed to technology firms’ balance sheets. The share of information technology and communication stocks in the global portfolio of all publicly traded bonds and equities as well as private assets peaked at a little above 15% in December 2021 and is still very high. The share of U.S. tech companies in this portfolio at the December peak was even greater than at the top of the dot-com bubble.

Risk could spread from private equity to credit and loans

Financial market exposure to corporate sector balance sheets is skewed to large businesses and well-established firms. Closely watched market indexes and spreads might not be the place to look first for signs of rising business failures in sectors that grew rapidly after the pandemic began.

The young, risky businesses are more frequently financed by banks and private capital and represent a large part of alternative investments. This area of the market grew rapidly in the decade of low interest rates and low volatility after the global financial crisis. Alternative investments now represent close to 8% of the global portfolio — not a negligible source of return or risk. This area is dominated by private equity.

Among subcategories of private equity, venture capital is likely to have the largest exposure to new establishments and is likely to be tested in the next downturn. These assets are highly illiquid and typically valued only once per year. Sectors to watch for significant job losses are information technology, administrative services, and professional services.

If private equity is tested and somewhat shaken, credit and loan markets with exposure to private equity might be affected. The impact of the Federal Reserve’s tightening is not likely to be confined to the crypto world.

Job reports are starting to show weakness in risky business sectors

Many companies start downsizing before business closures occur. In sectors likely to have more business failures, job losses might start in line with other sectors but then accelerate as defaults and closures rise. The recent ADP report pointed to small job losses in those sectors that are more exposed. There were also some tentative signs in the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) November report household survey. We might be at the very early stages of this adjustment. Business failures will come after.

FOMC participants speaking after the November rate hike talked about intentions to slow the pace of hikes. They discussed the uncertain timing in the economy’s response to monetary tightening — even as U.S. financial conditions loosened considerably in November. The widely expected downturn is still likely to arrive, but perhaps later than many — including some FOMC members — have in mind.


This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific time and is not intended to be a forecast of future events or a guarantee of future results. This information should not be relied upon as research or investment advice regarding any strategy or security in particular.

This material is prepared for use by institutional investors and investment professionals and is provided for limited purposes. This material is a general communication being provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not designed to be investment advice or a recommendation of any specific investment product, strategy, or decision, and is not intended to suggest taking or refraining from any course of action. The opinions expressed in this material represent the current, good-faith views of the author(s) at the time of publication. The views are provided for informational purposes only and are subject to change. This material does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status, or investment horizon. Investors should consult a financial advisor for advice suited to their individual financial needs. Putnam Investments cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any statements or data contained in the material. Predictions, opinions, and other information contained in this material are subject to change. Any forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and Putnam assumes no duty to update them. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks, and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. As with any investment, there is a potential for profit as well as the possibility of loss.

This material or any portion hereof may not be reprinted, sold, or redistributed in whole or in part without the express written consent of Putnam Investments. The information provided relates to Putnam Investments and its affiliates, which include The Putnam Advisory Company, LLC and Putnam Investments Limited®.


332064 12/22

More in: Fixed income, International, Macroeconomics