Q4 2020 Putnam Global Income Trust Q&A
- Global risk assets performed well for most of the quarter amid consistent investor demand.
- Investments in corporate credit and emerging-market debt fueled the fund’s relative performance. Interest-rate/yield-curve positioning and currency strategies detracted.
- Continuing recovery in the U.S. economy and the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines have sparked investor optimism entering 2021.
How did the fund perform for the three months ended December 31, 2020?
The fund’s class Y shares gained 4.11%, outpacing the 3.28% return of the benchmark Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond Index.
What was the market environment like during the fourth quarter of 2020?
Markets closed on a strong note to finish a most unusual year. News of multiple COVID-19 vaccines fueled hopes of returning to more normalcy in the economy, markets, and society as we move through 2021. Credit performed well with spreads tightening across the quality spectrum. [Bond prices rise as spreads tighten and fall as spreads widen.] Yields on longer-term U.S. Treasuries rose during the quarter, muting returns of indexes with a heavier government weighting, including the fund’s benchmark. Within this environment, investment-grade corporate bonds outpaced the broad investment-grade fixed-income market, but trailed high-yield corporate credit. International developed-market and emerging-market [EM] debt also performed well, but both categories modestly trailed high-yield credit in U.S.-dollar terms.
Although Treasury yields rose during the final three months of 2020, they remained below where they began the year. For example, the yield on the benchmark 10-year U.S. Treasury rose 0.22% to end 2020 at 0.91% after beginning the year at 1.92%.
Which holdings and strategies aided the fund’s relative outperformance?
Our corporate credit holdings — primarily investment-grade bonds — helped the most this quarter. Reflecting investor demand for risk, spreads on corporate securities continued to tighten during the final three months of 2020. [Spreads are the yield advantage credit-sensitive bonds offer over comparable-maturity U.S. Treasuries. Bond prices rise as spreads tighten and decline as spreads widen.]
Holdings of EM debt across a number of countries provided a further major boost to relative performance. Investments in Mexico, Senegal, the Dominican Republic, and the Ivory Coast were the top contributors. As noted above, the sector rallied in step with healthier risk dynamics and demand for higher-yielding securities.
Mortgage credit holdings also meaningfully contributed, led by our exposure to commercial mortgage-backed securities [CMBS]. December marked the fifth straight month that credit-driven mortgage securities aided the fund following a pullback in July.
Within CMBS, synthetic exposure via CMBX added the most value. [CMBX is a group of tradeable indexes that each reference a basket of 25 CMBS issued in a particular year.] While there continues to be a degree of negative sentiment toward certain property types, most notably hotels and malls, the availability of COVID-19 vaccines has sparked optimism that social-distancing measures could be meaningfully eased by the middle of 2021.
Positions in agency credit-risk transfer [CRT] securities also aided the fund’s performance. A variety of factors helped agency CRTs, including housing-related government policy measures in response to COVID-19, housing market strength, and optimism about the reopening of the economy. CRTs also benefited from a growing borrower base capitalizing on lower mortgage interest rates and improved home affordability
What about detractors?
The fund’s interest-rate and yield-curve positioning was the primary relative detractor. Rising interest rates and a steepening of the yield curve worked against the fund’s positioning this quarter.
The fund’s active-currency strategies also dampened performance versus the benchmark. This was mostly due to lower-than-benchmark exposure to the euro, the Japanese yen, and the British pound, as each of these currencies strengthened versus the U.S. dollar during the quarter.
What is your near-term outlook?
Across asset classes, market participants ended 2020 with significant optimism for 2021. Investors will remain focused on vaccine rollouts, corporate earnings, and any change in stance from the U.S. Federal Reserve [Fed] to see if that optimism remains justified as we head through 2021. We think the potential for additional fiscal stimulus has also brightened investors’ moods.
How was the fund positioned as of December 31?
We think measures by the Fed and other central banks to shore up marketplace liquidity amid the COVID-19 crisis may keep U.S. interest rates range bound for an extended period of time. As a result, we plan to keep the fund’s duration relatively close to that of its benchmark. In our view, having a portfolio duration greater than the benchmark [greater interest-rate sensitivity] in the current environment is not an effective hedge against credit risk within the portfolio.
We have a relatively positive medium-term outlook for corporate credit. While acknowledging the ongoing risks associated with COVID-19, we believe there are factors that will be supportive for the U.S. corporate credit market. These include demand for comparatively higher yields in the face of much lower yields globally. Also, investors are aware that the Fed is prepared to provide further support to the market via its bond purchase facilities if necessary.
Within the CMBS market, we believe borrowers with access to capital will continue to make investments in properties that were performing well before the pandemic hampered their revenue streams. As a result, we continue to have conviction in the fund’s CMBX exposure. We believe current valuations fairly compensate investors for existing risk levels and provide an attractive risk premium.
Fundamental credit analysis and security selection are particularly important in the current CMBS market environment. While some parts of the CMBS market will likely continue to struggle, there are CMBS backed by what we consider to be strong underlying collateral that have suffered amid widespread fear of the sector. We think many of these bonds represent attractive investment opportunities.
Within residential mortgage credit, we believe the dislocations that occurred in March have been mitigated by U.S. monetary and fiscal policy and the gradual reopening of the economy. Against the backdrop of robust home sales and a rebound in mortgage originations, we continue to find value across numerous segments of the residential mortgage-backed market.
In non-U.S. sovereign debt in both developed and emerging markets, we continue to favor countries that we believe have responded effectively to COVID-19. We also like countries with younger populations and those with more-favorable prospects for economic growth, as well as reasonably effective debt management.
In prepayment-sensitive areas of the market, we continue to find value in agency interest-only [IO] collateralized mortgage obligations and inverse IOs backed by jumbo loans and more seasoned collateral. Prepayment speeds on the mortgages underlying these securities stabilized after rising during the summer. This gave investors greater confidence in their ability to build models that anticipate speeds going forward, even if they remain at higher levels. [Mortgage refinancing and early repayment of outstanding mortgages drives prepayment speeds.] Overall, we view prepayment-related opportunities as attractive sources of diversification for the fund.
More in: Fixed income,