Q1 2021 Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund Q&A
- Bank loans gained about 2% in the first quarter, aided by rising longer-term interest rates and demand for higher-yielding securities.
- Security selection and underweight allocations in the outperforming technology and services sectors detracted from relative performance this quarter.
- We have a generally positive intermediate-term view on the market’s fundamental environment and supply-and-demand backdrop.
How did the fund perform for the three months ended March 31, 2021?
The fund’s class Y shares rose 0.81%, trailing the 1.78% return of the benchmark S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan Index.
What was the fund’s investment environment like during the first quarter of 2021?
High-yield bank loans posted a solid gain in the January–February period, aided by better-than-expected corporate earnings, before pulling back somewhat in March. Encouraging vaccine news bolstered investor optimism about the strength of the economic recovery in 2021. A $1.9 trillion Covid-19 aid package signed into law by President Biden in early March provided a further boost to market sentiment. Concerns about the potential inflationary impact of additional stimulus on top of an already-recovering economy led to an exodus from government bonds, which drove longer-term interest rates higher.
Rising interest rates provided a favorable backdrop for loans during the quarter, given their floating-rate feature. After beginning 2021 at 0.93%, the yield on the benchmark 10-year U.S. Treasury note reached 1.74% by March 31. Historically, investors have used loans as a tactical hedge against rising interest rates.
New issuance of loans reached the second-highest quarterly total on record during the period, as issuers sought to capitalize on historically low yields. Loan funds, meanwhile, reported consistently strong inflows throughout the quarter.
Within this environment, loans outpaced both high-yield bonds and the broad investment-grade fixed-income market for the quarter.
In the fund’s benchmark, every cohort but one posted a gain, led by energy and gaming, lodging & leisure, each of which advanced about 4%. Additional outperformers included metals & mining, consumer products, transportation, and services, with each rising about 3%. Conversely, broadcasting [-1%], cable & satellite [+1%], and utilities [+1%] underperformed the index. From a credit-rating perspective, lower-quality loans generated the highest gains, signaling a comfort level with risk as investors sought higher yields.
What factors had the biggest influence on the fund’s relative performance?
Versus the benchmark, security selection and underweight allocations in the outperforming technology and services sectors were the biggest negatives. Adverse overall positioning in health care and picks in gaming, lodging & leisure also hampered relative results.
What is your outlook for the bank loan market over the coming months?
We have a generally positive outlook overall. Although we expect the ongoing global health crisis to affect the high-yield loan market, we have a constructive intermediate-term view of corporate fundamentals and the market’s supply-and-demand backdrop. Also, even though loan spreads retightened following their sizable widening in March, and compressed further on favorable vaccine news, we think valuations remain relatively attractive. [Spreads are the yield advantage loans offer over comparable-maturity U.S. Treasurys.]
From a fundamental perspective, we continue to closely monitor sectors that were heavily affected by the pandemic, such as energy; gaming, lodging & leisure; and retail. Within these groups, we are focusing on the health of issuers’ balance sheets and liquidity metrics as well as the risk of defaults or credit-rating downgrades.
Due to the Covid-19 pandemic, loan defaults in 2020 exceeded our expectations. In 2021, however, we believe broad vaccine distribution and fewer defaults in the energy sector should lead to a reduced level of overall defaults.
As for supply/demand dynamics, loan new issuance surged in February to the fourth-highest monthly total on record and reached $301.4 billion for the quarter, a 52% increase over the same period in 2020. On the demand side, after registering outflows for most of 2020, loan funds [mutual funds and exchange-traded funds] posted inflows of $11.1 billion for the first quarter. Since rising rates have historically led to greater demand for loans, if interest rates continue to move higher, we believe investor capital will continue to flow into the asset class.
Collateralized loan obligations [CLOs] continued to be a substantial source of loan demand this period. [CLOs bundle corporate loans and sell slices of the debt to institutional investors.] In February, gross CLO volume reached the highest monthly total ever recorded. For the quarter as a whole, CLO volume equaled $106.4 billion, compared with $41.8 billion in the first quarter of 2020.
CLOs now account for roughly two thirds of the total assets in the loan market, while retail funds represent only about 10%. As a result, despite a substantial increase in loan supply, we think the market’s technical environment is favorable. Stronger demand from both retail investors and CLOs is meeting higher-net new loan issuance.
From a valuation standpoint, the average yield spread of the fund’s benchmark tightened to 4.4 percentage points over U.S. Treasurys as of period-end, below the long-term average of six percentage points. The benchmark’s yield was 4.89% as of March 31, significantly below its 11-year average of 7.33%. Optimism over continued government stimulus and vaccine distribution drove loan prices higher and yields lower during the period. Despite tighter spreads and lower yields, we think the market’s income potential remains attractive in the face of much lower global yields.
More in: Fixed income,